Marriott-Slaterville City
1570 West 400 North
Marriott-Slaterville City, Utah 84404
Phone: 801.627.1919
Facsimile: 801.627.1880
In accordance with Utah Code Annotated §10-3-606, the Marriott-Slaterville City Council, acting as the legislative body, adopts the following Rules of Procedure and Order (hereafter "Rules") for conducting public meetings held by Marriott-Slaterville City (hereafter "City"). These Rules are designed to provide for orderly conduct of a public body in a public meeting, with the objective of providing for full, open, and comprehensive debate of issues before the public body in a public forum with respect to citizen awareness and civil discourse.
These procedures neither increase nor diminish the powers or authority of the public body as stated in state law or local regulation.
These rules are subject to the municipal code, specifically the Municipal Administrative Code in Title 2 and Municipal Procedures under Tile 3.
There are two types of meetings as follows:
All meetings shall be administered according to the Open and Public Meetings Act.
Members of a public body shall comply with the Rules of Ethical Conduct set forth in Chapter 2.40 of the Marriott-Slaterville Municipal Code, or as may be established by state law.
The following governs parliamentary conduct of a public meeting. The City Administrator serves as Parliamentarian, and may also advise and speak, as necessary, for effective meeting governance, on any agenda items, and otherwise during the course of the meeting. Each rule is followed by a recommended procedure along with a purpose. This is to help guide the presiding officer and members of the public body with the intended application.
A public meeting is governed by the agenda, and the agenda constitutes the public body’s roadmap for the meeting.
Each agenda item will be handled by the Presiding Officer in the following basic format:
All meetings must comply with the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act which requires that a notice and an agenda for a public meeting be prepared in advance of the meeting and that no final action be taken on any item that is not on the agenda. In addition, the Act requires that the minutes of the meeting contain certain minimum information including the name of any member of the public body speaking on an issue, the substance of what the member says, an accurate description of any action taken by the public body and the voting record of each individual member of the public body.
Any matter that requires a formal decision shall be brought before the public body by motion.
The procedure for any motion shall be as follows:
The purpose of this rule is to limit items under discussion to only those that the public body want to discuss. This gives clarity as to what is being decided. It also helps to make sure everyone, including the person taking the minutes actually knows and can remember what the ultimate outcome of any discussion and debate is.
Only one question and one speaker at a time.
Only one agenda item will be discussed at a time. Any agenda item where action is being taken may have a maximum of (3) motions on the floor at a given time. There will only be one speaker at a time. The Presiding Officer recognizes the person speaking by granting them the floor so they may speak.
The purpose is to focus on only one agenda item and to allow members of the public body the ability to express their points of consideration without losing their train of thought and to completely finish without fear of interruption.
The Presiding Officer may use General Consent (also known as Unanimous Consent) with all motions, except where roll call votes are required for purposes of the meeting minutes.
When the Presiding Officer feels the public body would be in general agreement, the Presiding Officer may take action barring any objection otherwise. If there is any objection to a General Consent stated by the Presiding Officer, then a formal vote is required. If there is no objection, after a brief pause by the Presiding Officer to the proposed General Consent, then the Presiding Officer declares the General Consent approved. (Example: The Presiding Officer states, "If there is no objection, we will take a 10 minutes recess." [Pause to see if any member objects]. "There being no objection, we are in recess for 10 minutes.")
General consent is helpful in expediting general routine business or when the Presiding Officer believes the presiding body is in agreement. This allows flexibility of the Rules while protecting the right of the majority to decide and the minority to be heard.
There are generally only three basic forms of motions used: Initial Motions, Motions to Amend, and Substitute Motions.
"Motions to amend" and "substitute motions" are often confused. But they are quite different, and their effect (if passed) is quite different. A motion to amend seeks to retain the basic motion on the floor, but modify it in some way. A substitute motion seeks to throw out the basic motion on the floor, and substitute a new and different motion for it. The decision as to whether a motion is really a "motion to amend" or a "substitute motion" is left to the Presiding Officer. So that if a member makes what the member calls a "motion to amend," but the Presiding Officer determines that it is really a "substitute motion," then the Presiding Officer’s designation governs.
The debate can continue as long as members of the public body wish to discuss an item, subject to the Presiding Officer determining it is time to move on and take action by using General Consent to limit debate or by a proper motion by a member of the public body to limit the debate. The following motions are not debatable: a motion to adjourn (does not require second); a motion to recess; a motion to fix a time to adjourn; a motion to table; and a motion to limit debate.
There are exceptions to the general rule of free and open debate on motions. Use the procedure for making motions to end ongoing and needless debate, to conclude or delay discussion on an item, or close a meeting.
Debate and discussion are important until they are not. When a matter is chewed on enough it should be swallowed. This rule allows the Presiding Officer by General Consent or the majority vote to end debate, after a reasonable time. It also keeps those in a minority position on an issue from filibustering until they get their way.
Three yes votes are required to pass any item before the City Council with limited exceptions. The exceptions include a motion to go into closed session (executive session) which requires a 2/3 vote of the members present and when specifically provided in state law. The Planning Commission decisions are made by a majority of quorum members present. A quorum of the Planning Commission is four (4) members.
If the Presiding Officer and all five members of the council are present, a vote of 3-2 passes the motion. A vote of 2-2 means the motion fails. If one member is absent and the vote is 2-2, the Mayor is entitled to vote. The Planning Commission Chair is always entitled to vote as any regular member of the commission.
State law sets both the number required for a quorum and the minimum vote required on any issue. This rule is meant to clarify that when the entire City Council is present and voting then it is not a tie when one member abstains. If however the member is absent from the meeting for any reason and the vote is 2-2, then it may be a tie vote which entitles the Mayor to vote and break the tie. The Planning Commission makes decisions by simple majority of those present.
A motion to reconsider may be made, but it is subject to special rules. The first rule relates to timing. A motion to reconsider must be made at the meeting where the item was first voted upon or at the very next meeting if the item is properly provided on the agenda. In addition, a motion to reconsider cannot be made at a special meeting, unless the number of members of the public body present at the special meeting equals or exceeds the number present at the meeting when the original action was taken. Second, a motion to reconsider can only be made by a member who voted in the majority on the original motion. Any member of the public body may second a motion to reconsider regardless of whether they voted for or against the original motion. The Planning Commission cannot make motions to reconsider because once their decision is made it is turned over to the City Council for action or the appeal period is started as provided by law.
If such a member has a change of heart, he or she can make a "motion to reconsider" (any other member of the public body may second the motion). If a member who voted in the minority seeks to make the motion to reconsider, it must be ruled out of order.
The purpose of this rule is finality. If a member of the minority could make a motion to reconsider, then the item could be brought back to the public body again and again. That would defeat the purpose of finality. Nothing in this Rule shall be interpreted to prevent a member of the Planning Commission from filing an appeal to a decision made by the commission. If the motion to reconsider passes, then the original matter is back before the public body, and a new initial motion is then in order. The matter can be discussed and debated as if it were on the floor for the first time.
The Presiding Officer administers a meeting according to parliamentary procedure specified in Roberts Rules of Order, newly revised, as freely adapted by the Presiding Officer, and subject to these Rules.
The Presiding Officer is primarily responsible to see that debate and discussion of an agenda item focuses on the topic, not the personalities of the members of the public body. There are, however, exceptions that are intended to assist the Presiding Officer in keeping order during a meeting. A speaker may be interrupted by a member only for the following reasons and in the form set forth below:
Privilege. The proper interruption would be: "point of privilege". The Presiding Officer would then ask the interrupter to "state your point." Appropriate points of privilege relate to anything that would interfere with the normal comfort or safety at the meeting, or when the misrepresentation is occurring. For example, the room may be too hot or too cold, a blowing fan might interfere with a person’s ability to hear, or the speaker may be misrepresenting.
Order. The proper interruption would be: "point of order". The Presiding Officer would ask the interrupter to "state your point". Appropriate points of order relate to anything that would not be considered appropriate conduct of the meeting.
Appeal. If the Presiding Officer makes a ruling that a member of the public body disagrees with, that member may appeal the ruling of the Presiding Officer. If the motion is seconded, and after debate, if it passes by a simple majority vote, then the ruling of the Presiding Officer is deemed reversed.
Call for Orders of the Day. This is simply another way of saying, "let’s return to the agenda". If a member or the Parliamentarian believes that the public body has drifted from the agenda, such a call may be made. It does not require a vote, and when the Presiding Officer feels that the agenda is not being followed, the Presiding Officer simply reminds the public body to return to the agenda item properly before them.
Withdraw a Motion. To withdraw a motion, the maker of the motion on the floor states, "I withdraw my motion". The motion to withdraw may require a simple majority vote if the motion was seconded, unless the Presiding Officer allows withdrawal by General Consent.
Debate and discussion should be focused, but free and open. In the interest of time, the Presiding Officer may, however, limit the time allotted to speakers, including members of the public body. If time is limited, a member may only continue to speak after time has expired on a majority vote of the public body. The Rules are meant to create an atmosphere where the members of the public body can fairly and effectively operate, and members of the public can attend to watch. It is up to the Presiding Officer and members of the public body to maintain common courtesy and decorum.
Utah Code §10-3-502 – Regular and special council meetings.
Utah Code §10-3-504 – Quorum defined.
Utah Code §10-3-505 – Compelling attendance at meetings of legislative body.
Utah Code §10-3-506 – How the vote is taken.
Utah Code §10-3-507 – Minimum vote required.
Utah Code §10-3-508 – Reconsideration.
Utah Code §10-3-601 – Business of governing body conducted only in open meeting.
Utah Code §10-3-607 – Rules of conduct for members of the governing body.
Utah Code §10-3-608 – Rules of conduct for the public.